This is an attempt to visualise some of the findings of the recent online PBL trial.
Once upon a time there was the 3c tree for online learning...
through supportive facilitation we will all start communicating...
and lay the foundations of a community...
in which we will all be able to collaborate...
and learn together to (co-)construct new knowledge.
The above is a very simplistic representation of my thoughts linked to the role the human factors play within online PBL and other online learning activities more generally. I felt the need to create the 3c tree. It helped me understand better how the human factor, and especially online facilitation, influences and to what extend online collaborative learning beyond peer-to-peer support structures. Facilitation is what holds it all together!
Gif version of the 3c tree for online learning
3c tree for online learning
Alpha Version: 3C tree for online learning, an attempt to visualise my thoughts
an attempt to organise and visualise my thoughts (warning! this is not
a model but could be developed into one!) linked to the evaluation
of the online PBL trial I am working on at the moment. Images
created based on some sketches made in the train on pink sticky
notes, digitalised with Photoshop and action added at http://www.loogix.com
Captions are missing at the moment from the visualisation seen here. A more complete visualisation will follow soon. Not sure how I will get the captions on… so that they don’t look like foreign bodies. I will try my best.
Making also good progress with my dissertation. Just some more work is needed to finalise the draft. Feeling more positive already. I still have to write this paper for the PBL conference. Deadline is a bit later in January. I hope I will make it. I have to!
Happy New Year!
Back here to check where I am with my online PBL trial completed a few weeks ago thanks to all participants and the 2 facilitators. In total, we had 2 drop-outs (work and family reasons) but both groups come up with solutions to the given scenario and provided feedback to each other. So, mission accomplished. There, were of course a number of issues, which are coming out of the data and are in line with my own observations and I find that really interesting. More on that to follow further down.
I have now completed all interviews, except 1 participant from whom I will hopefully hear this week. I have to admit that I felt overwhelmed by the data collected through the interviews. The good thing is that it is so rich and will help me to capture the variation of the experience. It also helps that everybody who completed the trial was interviewed. A few participants had technical problems and we couldn’t use skype (used the MP3 Skype Recorder– really good!!!) or any other technology to talk and record and we emailed each other and had, if I can say conducted an asynchronous interview. It worked but I have to admit that the data I received by speaking with participants and facilitators directly, was richer. Let’s hope that the remaining participant will respond to my invitation.
After recording the interviews, I had to transcribe them. I had heard when you do it yourself you really get to know your data. Not that I was looking forward to transcribing these 30-40min interviews but this gave me hope that the time spent wouldn’t be wasted. And it definitely wasn’t. I ended up with loads of pages in Word. What next? I went for excel and created a table to insert the data and create categories as I was going along. Not as easy at it sounds and I definitely haven’t finished with the categories and will probably have to re-think my approach to categories anyway. We will see in the next few days. But I would like to use this opportunity to share with you the very very first findings:
Almost nobody, including the facilitators had participated as a learner or tutor in online programmes before. Scary! However, all participated because they found the idea interesting, wanted to find out about online PBL and explore if it could be used in own practice. That was encouraging. Also, the opportunity to work with colleagues from other institutions and other disciplines was also a factor why most decided to participate in this trial. Some of the participants stated that they had negotiated with their own institutions to use work done during this trial for assessment for one of their PgCert modules. I was very pleased to find out about that and I wish the facilitators knew about that!
- Time seems to come up again and again. Everybody was very busy!
- The technology and tools used.
- Working 100% online problematic.
- Some commented that asynchronous communication slowed things down
- The social element was missing and many commented on this!!!
- Facilitation! This was the biggest issue of all and recognised by participants and the facilitators themselves.
Suggestions made by participants and facilitators:
- Facilitators to receive training in advance
- More structured and supportive approach to facilitation
- Arranging regular synchronous meetings and
- participants and facilitators to get to know each other and create the foundations of a learning community from the very beginning.
- Everybody found it a useful experience and learnt a lot despite the above issues
- The trial provided an insight into the problems of working fully online, engaging in PBL (as a student or facilitator) and made them think of developing strategies to resolve these
- Participants and facilitators see a potential in using online PBL with some adjustments to resolve the above issues but most feel that blended PBL would work better. Nothing can replace face-to-face sessions – many told me during the interviews.
The above are my very first observations, which will be refined further after more thorough analysis of the data.
The next 2 weeks will be very exciting and will enable me to immerse in the data attempting to make sense of it all.
I have been away from this blog for a while now. Or at least it appears this way… some of my posts have remained as drafts. But I feel it is time to return and re-surface. The truth is that I was also blogging on our LDU/ADU space
and shared there my thoughts about the core PGCAP module and other activities I was involved or was thinking about.
However, other things have happened during that time. The PBL trial is now almost over as well. Final questionnaires need to be completed and interviews organised. Transcribing the interviews will be exciting but I think I already feel a bit overwhelmed with the amount of data I will collect. We will see. Still a lot of work to do on this.
What else, in the process of starting to write something with 2 of our PGCAP participants. I am really looking forward to that. Actually I am not just looking forward to that. It is very exciting!!! More to come very shortly.
There are plans to use the MoRe model in cohort 2 with my tutee group. Creating the space and setting it all up at the moment. I think there is a huge potential to use it within Academic Development. The key is to be there, to facilitate learning. People seem to think online learning just happens on its own…
Also thinking to come back and reflect within this space in the next semester but at the moment I am not sure. Chrissi think, think, think and decide. We will see.
well, we won’t be able to use categories after all… had to decide for tags. This was the easy option without changing rights. Sometimes, we just have to go for the easy option and think on our feet. Nothing wrong with that!
I have to admit that I assumed that authors could add categories within wordpress, but apparently that is not the case, unless you go and add rights following a specific procedure, which I started looking at but it seemed too complicated at this stage. I should have checked that earlier!!! Anyway, the tags are also a good solution and I have decided to monitor posts and add tags if not used, so that when I come to analyse the data, it will be a bit easier for me.
So, no new categories but yes to tags! Participants are still able to select from existing categories. I have do look further into the difference of categories and tags. I think the difference is in the rights, who can add, edit what and there are good reasons for that depending on the project. Categories seem to work at project/admin level. Tags seem a more personal approach to categorisation. Must explore further.
Useful link to who can do what within wordpress. Just click here to view the default rights.
We had the opportunity to have a chat on Skype, the 2 PBL tutors who participate in the trial and myself. I should have done this before the trial started… communication is so much more effective when you actually talk to the other person… and can clarify things faster. It somehow feels less complicated. In a written message it is easy to loose track and mis-understand or not understand at all. I am happy that we managed to find the time to have that skype chat today. Issues were identified and some of them resolved. Collectively, we came up with some solutions. I think one of the most significant one is the use of categories when posting. Introducing the ones below, will make things easier for everybody.
For me as well, since I am most of all interested in how participants experience this trial and their reflective accounts. This new system, will help me identify their reflections with a mouse click. Super… if, of course, the categories are used. Somebody will have to monitor in the background if that is the case and this will be me.
We decided to introduce the use of categories
for now to make it easier to access what is posted. All existing posts have now been categorised. We need to let participants know to select one of the above categories when they post something new.
Also, it would be good to untick the ‘allow pings’ button before publishing something new that we don’t get everybody else’s posts within the trial space. Not excactly sure how pinging works but outside posts seem to be linked to ours. COuld I maybe change the default settings? Will have to check that one out as well.
It was also suggested that PBL tutors could subscribe to receive email notifications of any new posts, which would save a lot of time and energy checking the trial space and keeping on top about what is happening. We need to let participants know about that as well because it will make things easier for them as well.
How I feel at the moment? I think PBL tutors have now a better understanding of the trial and what is planned to happen and their involvement. Already PBL tutors have taken a more active approach and are establishing an online presence among the participants and have started engaging in a dialogue.
The weekend has started but I can’t stop thinking about this trial.
little feet, little steps... the wings are opening
Officially we started on the 6th of September the online PBL trial. It took us a while to sort out the technology and mainly to get the wordpress accounts created and link them to the group blog. Everybody is now happy, am I right?, and the ethical issue has also been resolved.
I have to remember that it is a small group and took quite a while, what could one do for larger groups? I think self-registration would definitely be a big bonus. We are all sorted now.
First posts have started appearing despite the fact that PBL tutors are not present yet. They are on their way, so to speak and will be live on Monday the latest. I can just feel, at the moment, that we definitely need a facilitator in online groups, somebody who co-ordinates what is happening, how and when. It might not have to be the tutor. It could be somebody who takes the lead from within the group but then this person would have to have the support of his/her peers. And there are other issues linked to that as well into which I am not going to go now.
A mini meeting with the PBL tutors has been planned and Monday they will be ready to start. I am stepping back and observe in the background. This is the hardest of it all, because I would love to be part of it. The nature of this research project, however, doesn’t let me… I hope that I will be able to re-create such an approach in the near future with our PGCAP participants. We will see.